The purpose of this report is to objectively assess and rank a player’s physical performance against all other players competing in the same position in National (France). This report draws on the full range of individual physical-performance data by position collected by SkillCorner (https://skillcorner.com) for the 2025-2026 season of the National championship. Only players who completed at least 90 minutes of effective playing time were retained in the analysis.
Three main indicators were selected to assess players’ physical performance:
• total distance covered (km),
• high-intensity running distance, i.e. running between 20 and 25 km/h (m),
• sprint distance, i.e. running above 25 km/h (m).
We have grouped players into 10 categories, each corresponding to 10% of the observed population. All performances recorded over the season are ordered from lowest to highest, then divided into 10 equal bands known as deciles. A player ranked in the “Top 10%” is among the 10% of highest performances for their position. Conversely, a player ranked in the “Bottom 10%” is among the 10% of lowest performances. Table 1 below presents these 10 categories.
Table 1: Decile interpretation system.
Decile | Percentile | Description |
Top 10% | ≥ P90 | Excellent |
10-20% | P80 - P90 | Very good |
20-30% | P70 - P80 | Good |
30-40% | P60 - P70 | Above average |
40-50% | P50 - P60 | Slightly above the median |
50-60% | P40 - P50 | Slightly below the median |
60-70% | P30 - P40 | Below average |
70-80% | P20 - P30 | Low |
80-90% | P10 - P20 | Very low |
Bottom 10% | < P10 | Extremely low |
CENTRE-BACK
1026 observations • 104 players
Table 2 presents the physical-data benchmark for centre-backs in National.
Table 2: Physical-data benchmark for centre-backs (km).
Total distance (km) | High-intensity dist. 20-25 km/h (m) | Sprint dist. >25 km/h (m) | |||||
Band | Decile | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value |
Excellent | Top 10% | 11.03 | - | 558.0 | - | 223.0 | - |
Very good | 10-20% | 10.76 | 11.03 | 507.0 | 558.0 | 185.0 | 223.0 |
Good | 20-30% | 10.57 | 10.76 | 461.5 | 507.0 | 163.5 | 185.0 |
Above average | 30-40% | 10.41 | 10.57 | 435.0 | 461.5 | 142.0 | 163.5 |
Slightly above the median | 40-50% | 10.28 | 10.41 | 412.0 | 435.0 | 128.0 | 142.0 |
Slightly below the median | 50-60% | 10.14 | 10.28 | 387.0 | 412.0 | 114.0 | 128.0 |
Below average | 60-70% | 9.99 | 10.14 | 363.0 | 387.0 | 98.5 | 114.0 |
Low | 70-80% | 9.82 | 9.99 | 334.0 | 363.0 | 82.0 | 98.5 |
Very low | 80-90% | 9.60 | 9.82 | 292.0 | 334.0 | 62.0 | 82.0 |
Extremely low | Bottom 10% | - | 9.60 | - | 292.0 | - | 62.0 |
FULL-BACK
413 observations • 88 players
Table 3 presents the physical-data benchmark for full-backs in National.
Table 3: Physical-data benchmark for full-backs (km).
Total distance (km) | High-intensity dist. 20-25 km/h (m) | Sprint dist. >25 km/h (m) | |||||
Band | Decile | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value |
Excellent | Top 10% | 11.54 | - | 810.0 | - | 366.8 | - |
Very good | 10-20% | 11.25 | 11.54 | 743.6 | 810.0 | 315.6 | 366.8 |
Good | 20-30% | 11.03 | 11.25 | 702.0 | 743.6 | 284.0 | 315.6 |
Above average | 30-40% | 10.92 | 11.03 | 678.2 | 702.0 | 266.0 | 284.0 |
Slightly above the median | 40-50% | 10.78 | 10.92 | 642.0 | 678.2 | 242.0 | 266.0 |
Slightly below the median | 50-60% | 10.63 | 10.78 | 606.0 | 642.0 | 216.0 | 242.0 |
Below average | 60-70% | 10.47 | 10.63 | 562.6 | 606.0 | 183.2 | 216.0 |
Low | 70-80% | 10.27 | 10.47 | 527.4 | 562.6 | 158.4 | 183.2 |
Very low | 80-90% | 9.99 | 10.27 | 485.6 | 527.4 | 115.4 | 158.4 |
Extremely low | Bottom 10% | - | 9.99 | - | 485.6 | - | 115.4 |
WING-BACK
268 observations • 64 players
Table 4 presents the physical-data benchmark for wing-backs in National.
Table 4: Physical-data benchmark for wing-backs (km).
Total distance (km) | High-intensity dist. 20-25 km/h (m) | Sprint dist. >25 km/h (m) | |||||
Band | Decile | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value |
Excellent | Top 10% | 12.05 | - | 890.6 | - | 387.3 | - |
Very good | 10-20% | 11.84 | 12.05 | 841.0 | 890.6 | 343.6 | 387.3 |
Good | 20-30% | 11.61 | 11.84 | 785.9 | 841.0 | 313.8 | 343.6 |
Above average | 30-40% | 11.44 | 11.61 | 755.2 | 785.9 | 283.4 | 313.8 |
Slightly above the median | 40-50% | 11.27 | 11.44 | 724.5 | 755.2 | 257.0 | 283.4 |
Slightly below the median | 50-60% | 11.08 | 11.27 | 689.8 | 724.5 | 231.8 | 257.0 |
Below average | 60-70% | 10.92 | 11.08 | 655.2 | 689.8 | 215.0 | 231.8 |
Low | 70-80% | 10.69 | 10.92 | 619.2 | 655.2 | 186.4 | 215.0 |
Very low | 80-90% | 10.47 | 10.69 | 570.7 | 619.2 | 157.1 | 186.4 |
Extremely low | Bottom 10% | - | 10.47 | - | 570.7 | - | 157.1 |
DEFENSIVE MIDFIELDER
223 observations • 61 players
Table 5 presents the physical-data benchmark for defensive midfielders in National.
Table 5: Physical-data benchmark for defensive midfielders (km).
Total distance (km) | High-intensity dist. 20-25 km/h (m) | Sprint dist. >25 km/h (m) | |||||
Band | Decile | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value |
Excellent | Top 10% | 12.32 | - | 758.4 | - | 198.8 | - |
Very good | 10-20% | 12.12 | 12.32 | 680.8 | 758.4 | 169.8 | 198.8 |
Good | 20-30% | 11.94 | 12.12 | 634.4 | 680.8 | 148.4 | 169.8 |
Above average | 30-40% | 11.76 | 11.94 | 598.0 | 634.4 | 126.2 | 148.4 |
Slightly above the median | 40-50% | 11.60 | 11.76 | 570.0 | 598.0 | 111.0 | 126.2 |
Slightly below the median | 50-60% | 11.42 | 11.60 | 541.8 | 570.0 | 101.0 | 111.0 |
Below average | 60-70% | 11.31 | 11.42 | 508.0 | 541.8 | 83.0 | 101.0 |
Low | 70-80% | 11.15 | 11.31 | 454.0 | 508.0 | 70.4 | 83.0 |
Very low | 80-90% | 10.93 | 11.15 | 400.2 | 454.0 | 52.4 | 70.4 |
Extremely low | Bottom 10% | - | 10.93 | - | 400.2 | - | 52.4 |
CENTRAL MIDFIELDER
448 observations • 96 players
Table 6 presents the physical-data benchmark for central midfielders in National.
Table 6: Physical-data benchmark for central midfielders (km).
Total distance (km) | High-intensity dist. 20-25 km/h (m) | Sprint dist. >25 km/h (m) | |||||
Band | Decile | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value |
Excellent | Top 10% | 12.42 | - | 838.3 | - | 257.6 | - |
Very good | 10-20% | 12.15 | 12.42 | 770.6 | 838.3 | 207.2 | 257.6 |
Good | 20-30% | 11.95 | 12.15 | 708.7 | 770.6 | 171.0 | 207.2 |
Above average | 30-40% | 11.76 | 11.95 | 660.4 | 708.7 | 148.4 | 171.0 |
Slightly above the median | 40-50% | 11.58 | 11.76 | 617.0 | 660.4 | 126.5 | 148.4 |
Slightly below the median | 50-60% | 11.41 | 11.58 | 572.6 | 617.0 | 111.0 | 126.5 |
Below average | 60-70% | 11.29 | 11.41 | 530.2 | 572.6 | 95.0 | 111.0 |
Low | 70-80% | 11.08 | 11.29 | 485.4 | 530.2 | 75.0 | 95.0 |
Very low | 80-90% | 10.84 | 11.08 | 441.7 | 485.4 | 56.0 | 75.0 |
Extremely low | Bottom 10% | - | 10.84 | - | 441.7 | - | 56.0 |
WINGER
218 observations • 84 players
Table 7 presents the physical-data benchmark for wingers in National.
Table 7: Physical-data benchmark for wingers (km).
Total distance (km) | High-intensity dist. 20-25 km/h (m) | Sprint dist. >25 km/h (m) | |||||
Band | Decile | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value |
Excellent | Top 10% | 12.07 | - | 922.2 | - | 379.3 | - |
Very good | 10-20% | 11.60 | 12.07 | 815.8 | 922.2 | 325.6 | 379.3 |
Good | 20-30% | 11.38 | 11.60 | 757.9 | 815.8 | 289.6 | 325.6 |
Above average | 30-40% | 11.21 | 11.38 | 725.4 | 757.9 | 264.2 | 289.6 |
Slightly above the median | 40-50% | 11.06 | 11.21 | 687.5 | 725.4 | 239.0 | 264.2 |
Slightly below the median | 50-60% | 10.89 | 11.06 | 653.2 | 687.5 | 213.0 | 239.0 |
Below average | 60-70% | 10.71 | 10.89 | 619.2 | 653.2 | 188.0 | 213.0 |
Low | 70-80% | 10.44 | 10.71 | 580.4 | 619.2 | 161.0 | 188.0 |
Very low | 80-90% | 9.98 | 10.44 | 541.3 | 580.4 | 133.7 | 161.0 |
Extremely low | Bottom 10% | - | 9.98 | - | 541.3 | - | 133.7 |
FORWARD
280 observations • 82 players
Table 8 presents the physical-data benchmark for forwards in National.
Table 8: Physical-data benchmark for forwards (km).
Total distance (km) | High-intensity dist. 20-25 km/h (m) | Sprint dist. >25 km/h (m) | |||||
Band | Decile | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value | Min. value | Max. value |
Excellent | Top 10% | 11.91 | - | 853.2 | - | 341.1 | - |
Very good | 10-20% | 11.57 | 11.91 | 792.6 | 853.2 | 309.0 | 341.1 |
Good | 20-30% | 11.28 | 11.57 | 746.9 | 792.6 | 279.3 | 309.0 |
Above average | 30-40% | 11.07 | 11.28 | 706.0 | 746.9 | 249.8 | 279.3 |
Slightly above the median | 40-50% | 10.87 | 11.07 | 671.5 | 706.0 | 227.5 | 249.8 |
Slightly below the median | 50-60% | 10.69 | 10.87 | 633.0 | 671.5 | 206.6 | 227.5 |
Below average | 60-70% | 10.39 | 10.69 | 592.4 | 633.0 | 178.0 | 206.6 |
Low | 70-80% | 10.15 | 10.39 | 547.8 | 592.4 | 151.6 | 178.0 |
Very low | 80-90% | 9.83 | 10.15 | 475.5 | 547.8 | 119.9 | 151.6 |
Extremely low | Bottom 10% | - | 9.83 | - | 475.5 | - | 119.9 |
After a performance, players often want to know where they stand relative to others, namely their opponents, their rivals and their team-mates. Coaches also need a benchmark to pair players, to respond to the demands posed by the opposition or to pose problems for an opponent. Recruiters and sporting directors likewise need to know where the players they wish to sign stand; this is sometimes a decisive criterion in player selection. The benchmarks set out in this article provide a sound basis for quickly identifying players’ physical profiles.
If you would like an in-depth analysis of a player or a position, please do not hesitate to contact us at contact@felisperformance.com